![Arvind Kejriwal](http://media.assettype.com/vikatan%2F2024-01%2F602172b9-373a-44ab-9f52-ef4d52bfc743%2Faravind_kej_cover_2.jpg?rect=0%2C0%2C1920%2C1080&w=480&auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=max)
Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi and leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), is under increasing scrutiny as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) intensifies its investigation into alleged corruption related to a liquor policy amendment in the financial year 2021-2022.
The controversy began with accusations of irregularities in the issuance of licenses and an illegal transfer of Rs 100 crore in the sale of liquor in New Delhi. Former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia was subsequently arrested by the ED, which argued there was evidence of a significant financial transfer and concerns about witness tampering.
Chief Minister Kejriwal, implicated in the formulation of the contentious liquor policy, has faced multiple summons from the ED. Despite being summoned three times, he has not appeared for questioning. Heavy police security was deployed around Kejriwal's residence amid speculations of a potential arrest.
In response to rumors, Kejriwal took to social media, vehemently denying any wrongdoing. He asserted that the ED has not presented evidence and labeled the summons as illegal. Kejriwal accused the BJP of attempting to defame him and prevent his campaign for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.
Political analysts suggest that an arrest could strengthen the opposition's alliance against the BJP, as Kejriwal is a key figure in the Opposition's India Alliance. However, the BJP maintains that the ED's actions are part of a legal investigation.
With parliamentary elections on the horizon, AAP leaders allege that the BJP is leveraging the ED to hinder Kejriwal's political activities. Meanwhile, BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia contends that Kejriwal is evading ED appearances, fearing arrest.
As the situation unfolds, Kejriwal is set to visit Gujarat, marking a critical moment in the ongoing crisis. The ED's reported preparation for a fourth summons adds uncertainty to the political landscape. The escalating tension underscores the intersection of legal scrutiny and political maneuvering.